The author working on 2 Acts? |
“Paul
lived for two years in his rented house. He welcomed everyone who
came to visit. He urgently presented all matters of the kingdom of
God. He explained everything about Jesus Christ. His door was always
open.” Acts 28:30-31,
The Message
“Whatever
be the truth, the fate of Paul is secondary to that of the gospel.
The final picture is of Paul preaching to the Gentiles the same
message which he had preached throughout Acts with boldness and
without hindrance. All the emphasis lies on that last
phrase...Nothing that men can do can stop the progress and ultimate
victory of the gospel. I.
Howard Marshall in Acts:
The Tyndale New Testament Commentary Series
A companion in the journey |
And
so the Book of Acts ends.
Is it “The End” or,
more properly, “The End?” In my year and a half personal study of
The Book of Acts I have enjoyed the company of fellow-travelers who
have accompanied me along the way – John R.W. Stott, I. Howard
Marshall, Ajith Fernando, Sir William Ramsay, Paul Maier and a few of
the Church fathers (mainly, Chrysostom) – serving at times like
experienced tour guides pointing out things a novice like myself
might have overlooked. Their observations have been insightful and
helpful in understanding the work and I come away with a far more
appreciation for it. It is definitely far more than just
a history book. Good scholars that they are at times they have
disagreed with one another, arriving at different conclusions about
certain events in the story.
Certain that Luke was planning a third installment |
Take,
for example, the “abrupt” conclusion to the book itself. Sir
William makes a strong case that Luke had always fully intended on
writing 2 Acts
but was prevented from doing so because of his premature death in the
same persecution that ultimately claimed Peter's and Paul's life.
Stott, Marshall and a whole lot of others who know their stuff
counter that the enigmatic ending was Luke's intention all along: the
great Story begun in Acts 1:8 will continue until its consummation at
the End of the Age when the Lord Jesus returns as promised. Maybe
both groups are right – while Luke had planned to write about what
happened after Paul's release from his two year house arrest in Rome
and the rest of his travels to Iberia and back unto martyrdom, Luke
would have most likely ended his second treatise on a high note: the
Founders may be gone but the Gospel continues to be carried forth
into all the world.
Did he find out about the rain in Spain? |
Maybe
the question to ask is not Why
does it end so abruptly
but How does the
abrupt end make me feel?
After all that Paul has been through to get to Rome – getting
nearly lynched in Jerusalem, the two-year house arrest in Caesarea
which included several hearings beforeboth Jewish and Roman
officials, the harrowing journey to Rome and at long last arriving
there only to discover the same obstinacy among his Jewish brethren
there as he found back in Palestine – is this really how his story
should end? It leaves me wanting to know what happened to him,
specifically with his hearing before the Roman Senate? As some
speculate, was he released? And did he make his trip to Spain? Or did
his two-year genial house arrest in Rome take a drastic turn due to
the madness of Emperor Nero which led to his speedy demise and
martyrdom? Whatever happened to Luke? Did he, as I have already
speculated, die in the same wave of persecution that claimed the
lives of Paul and Peter? Or was that his intent all along - to leave
us hanging so that we would put ourselves in Paul's shoes and carry
on what he and the other apostles began?
Frankly, after a year and a half of ruminating on this text I don't
want it to end. I want to hear “the rest of the story”? I want to
read Luke's proposed “third installment” even if he never
intended on writing one. What's odd to me is that after my year-long
sojourn in the patriarchs in 2011, I was eager to return to the
study of Jesus as told by Luke in 2012. But now after a year and a
half in Acts, I am hesitant to leave the study of Paul, Peter, Luke,
Timothy, Aristarchus and all the brothers. Not because I don't think
I need to learn more of Jesus – God knows I do – but simply
because I have grown attached to these guys and their daring and
their resolute determination to carry the gospel to the ends of the
earth. I want to know what happened to them, what they accomplished
and their end. I think that's why I began reading Eusebius (The
Church History) - out of the desire to learn of the fates of the
men who followed in the path of Peter and Paul who in turn were
following Christ.
Which brings me back to the idea of a Third Volume. I want the
story to continue. And maybe that is the genius of Luke in the choice
of his ending – it makes you want to look for more installments.
And ultimately you do find them but not within Scripture so much as
in the lives of those who have gone before us and those who continue
to carry the gospel (myself included) up to the present time. Like
Lloyd Oglivie once wrote, “The abrupt ending leaves us with the
challenge and opportunity to allow the Spirit to write the next
chapter in the Book of Acts today in and through us!” I pastor a
small fellowship in a small town in a county in our State not known
for its economic power nor political clout. But it's the place where
he has planted me and to the best of my ability I will continue to
preach the Scriptures, baptize and teach disciples and do all the
regular kinds of stuff that come with the territory of gospel work.
One day another will carry on the work I do now and within a few
years after my departure to another post or to my inheritance, my
name will be less known but Lord willing, the gospel will continue to
be preached at the fellowship that currently meets at the corner of
8th and Leonard in Chetek. It's how it should be. Like
Frodo reminded Sam while they were ascending the steps of Cirith
Ungol that while the great tale never ends “...the people in them
come, and go when their part's ended. Our part will end later – or
sooner” (“The Stairs of Cirith Ungol” in The Two Towers).
Until that time, may I be found faithful and play whatever is my part
to play in the greatest Story ever in the making.
Dr.
Paul Maier's conclusion of his little book First
Christians
is a fitting conclusion to my devotional study of Acts:
“All
of the apostles endured great hardships for the faith, many suffering
martyrdom itself. Not one of them could see the ultimate triumph of
Christianity – except through the eyes of faith and the inspiration
of the same Spirit who arrived with the first Pentecost and never
withdrew. Though at the time the Christian cause seemed persecuted,
burned, crucified, beheaded, and even eaten out of existence by the
greatest power in the world, a greater power was at work that would
see Christianity conquer Rome a little more than two centuries later,
and “the ends of the earth” after that, in Jesus' own
prediction.”
“It
was Christ, not Caesar, who captured the future.”