On Thanksgiving Day my folks and my sister,
Jenny, her husband, Dan and their little boy and my godson, Henry,
gathered at our home, as they have for many Thanksgivings running, to
celebrate the day. We enjoyed a wonderful dinner together that Linda
had lovingly made and our conversation was peppered with laughter and
lighthearted banter. And then it happened: after we had finished our
meal unintentionally we took a left turn down the cul-de-sac of
politics and the atmosphere in the room chilled a bit. Jenny and Dan
live in the suburbs of Minneapolis and I would consider them
politically liberal in their views on social issues. Linda and I, of
course, live in rural northern Wisconsin and while I don't consider
myself overly political I definitely am in the conservative camp (but
unlike my father-in-law am not a FOX junkie; I actually get a lot of
my news from NBC and NPR – go figure.)
As far as evangelical Christians are
concerned one of the biggest issues in Minnesota that was decided on
November 6 was that the proposed “marriage amendment” to the
State constitution would define marriage as it has traditionally been
defined (and, certainly how the Bible defines it) as the union
between a man and a woman. If you voted “yes” you were saying you
were in agreement with this position. If you voted “no” you
professed a much more inclusive idea of marriage that covered same
sex unions. Not surprisingly, the “nays” carried the day much to
my sister and my brother-in-law's relief. As Jenny explained to me,
she has many gay friends who feel like second-class citizens. Why
shouldn't their union be recognized as legitimate by the state?
They steered clear of our conversation |
Now both Jenny and Dan weren't gloating
about the victory even though they were aware that what they consider
progress my wife and I see as something quite different. And I
certainly wasn't trying to change their opinion on the matter. As
those conversations happen to flow, however, we were soon on to the national
election and our voice levels and body language began to morph from
comfortable and relaxed to tense and a sense of stepping delicately
through a minefield. While I'm sure they wouldn't put it exactly this
way they feel that the conservative element in our country is
self-righteous, self-indulgent and frankly, should keep their
opinions to themselves. To some degree they are correct. In our
efforts to speak up for “conservative values” we often come off
pretty indignant about a whole lot of things. For me, the only point
I was trying to brook is that if the Election of 2012 reveals
anything it demonstrates how divided a people we are becoming. Our
whole system of government is based on the principle of compromise –
give and take, budging here and there, seeking consensus where we
can. But therein lies the rub: if we can't even have a conversation
about the issue – for example, gay marriage – because one segment
of the population considers such a union as immoral how can we reach
a conclusion that most parties consider satisfactory? What do you do
with someone like myself who considers marriage the sole purview of
heterosexuals and cannot imagine a future where as a minister I will
preside at the joining of two individuals practicing a homosexual
lifestyle or risk being labeled as in-tolerant
for refusing to do the same?
Personally,
apart from sweeping societal changes on a religious level, I don't
think the evangelical community is going to win this argument. Those
who are persuaded that homosexuality is not a matter of choice but a
matter of hard-wiring have the numbers and pretty much are the
loudest voice in mainstream media. While I don't think a legitimate
Christian response is to resort to demagoguery and hate speech
against President Obama, the
Democrats and the “liberal media”, how do you speak your
convictions to a populace that has raised tolerance to a cardinal
virtue on an issue like same-sex unions without being misunderstood
and, ultimately, considered irrelevant?
Every
time I have posted something on homosexuality in the past at this
site (see The Sins of Sodom and You're Wrong President Obama) some friend in my Facebook circle has reacted
negatively to what I've written. Either I have done a poor job of
expressing my opinion (which is very possible) or their reaction is
proof of what I'm trying to say in this post. It makes me wonder if
what happened at our dinner table on Thanksgiving Day is a
microscopic view of what is happening on a macro-level all across our
country and I don't see it getting any better. My godson who is five
years old will grow up in a community and culture where same sex
unions will be viewed as normative – not alternative – and
depending where you sit at the table will depend on whether you think
that's progress or something far different. But for sure it will
become one more thing that we shouldn't talk
about when in polite company.